I was hinting at the same in my last post. IIRC this was kinda a thing with the boost feature on Nvidia GPUs too, where testing them on an open-air testbed would allow them to sustain higher clocks than they would in a normal PC case.
Assuming the throttling starts at a fixed point on these CPUs, you could get an idea of whether a reviewed CPU is likely impacted based on max temperature readings if they're available. Like power readings though, it's important to know what application those temps were measured with as it really does make a difference.
I imagine this has a lot to do with Intel's TIM - you need to go to great lengths to make a substantial difference to temps when you're fighting against a high resistance path built in to the CPU. I think I've moaned about this before, but it's so bad that fan speed makes little difference on my cooler (Hyper 212) and the motherboards stock fan profiles are pointlessly loud - if the heatsink is still stone cold with the fan at 800rpm then ramping to to 2000rpm will achieve nothing but annoyance. And mine is only a 65W TDP 7700!
FWIW here's some numbers from running y-cruncher (heavy AVX load):
I'm not too convinced about that uncore power (I suspect it could be erroneous as it tends to drop under load and idles around the 10W mark) but even looking at IA core power, it's exceeding TDP. Anyway, temp spikes to high 80's in a matter of seconds, long before the heatsink will have began to warm up. I'm quite uncomfortable with the thought of a higher-clocked 6-core version i.e. 8700k!!