And further rebuttals to show what nonsense this post is
You misunderstand what theory means with regard to the scientific meaning. Even wiki shows this here.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory. A theory can be just that and fact aswell.
See above. The evidence you speak of is abundent. Each new discovery supports the theory, it never does otherwise. Creationists can show no evidence to the contrary and they only use a god of the gaps argument. They try to pick up on the holes where the holes make up 0.001% of the evidence.
No, no, no no, no and no. Evolution is not chance - see my above post for the explanation. Secondly why do you say everything is in balance unless we disturb it? Surely we are as much part of nature as teh 30,000 plus odd beetles that live on the planet. I've always wonderred why god had such a hard on for beetles when he was designing the world
Again you show your ignorance. Infact evolution is far more statistically probable than "goddidit". It's about time scales, millions and millions of years and the adaptation to environment. As far as the cell is concerned I'm not sure what you are getting at. Are you talking about abiogenesis? Type "the first cell" into google and you'll find your answers.
Argument from personal incredularity. It has nothing to do with logic. Just because something is extremely complex does not mean to say that it can't happen by "chance". I'm sure that an integrated circuit makes "New York city look remakable simple.
And you are showing pure ignorance. Biologists do understand how the cell works, you can learn about it in biology lessons. The human genome has been mapped and we are finding out how DNA affects genetic disease and human traits daily. A friend of mine is a neuroscientist who lectures and researches at a well renowned university. He got his PHD at Cambridge and yes he doesn't understand everything but I can tell you that there is an enormous amount that he does know and indeed imparts that knowledge to others. Saying "ooh it's awfully complex and we don't know everything so therefore God" is stupid. It's a god of the gaps argument and is therefore worthless. There is no evidence that god or a higher being is responsible so yes I can rule that out until evidence is found to support that position.
This sentence means; I'm not arguing that gobbledegook should be taught as fact in schools, but nor should 2+2 be taught to equal 4. Let the students choose what they believe in. Anyone reading it with an ounce of sense will laugh at it's ridiculousness. I choose to believe that 2+2 =5. Because I believe it it is right? Nonsense, the whole idea of education is to impart knowledge.
How well did you do at school in your exams. Did you pass or did you just write what you chose to believe in. I'm sure it would have amused the exam markers, but it would have achieved little else. That is why we have peer review and science has some very important ground rules for determining experimentation before anything is supported as fact.