Page 6 of 23 FirstFirst ... 345678916 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 96 of 362

Thread: Hexus HandBrake charts - who has the greatest multi-threaded POWER!!??

  1. #81
    Senior Member 1stRaven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Lincoln, UK
    Posts
    929
    Thanks
    72
    Thanked
    95 times in 83 posts
    • 1stRaven's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus VIII Hero
      • CPU:
      • I7 6700K
      • Memory:
      • 16Gb Corsair DDR4 Vengeance
      • Storage:
      • 250Gb Samsung Evo 850 M.2, 2 x Samsung EVO 850 500Gb, Seagate 3tb HDD, 24Tb Unraid Server
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2 x PNY GTX 1080 FE
      • PSU:
      • EVGA Supernova G2 1000W
      • Case:
      • Be-Quiet Dark Pro 900 Silver
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x Dell 22" and 1 x Dell U2913WM
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 150Mb

    Re: Hexus HandBrake charts - who has the greatest multi-threaded POWER!!??

    Quote Originally Posted by Bagnaj97 View Post
    I think you're looking at the wrong line in that log:

    [11:04:27] work: average encoding speed for job is 34.745834 fps

    Have you still got the logs for your other transcodes? Also rather than massive posts can people please use pastebin or similar for logfiles.
    Good point. I blame my old age. lol. Just reran it and got 34.92 so that figure is correct. Apologies for the mispost.

    As a side note, i ran the Tron conversion in arcsoft's media converter as that will use quicksync and got a 156mb file in 28 seconds. Did a little research and it appears that handbrake doesn't support quicksync on the z68 and h67 boards so that is the possibility of going even quicker with this.

  2. #82
    Senior Member kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    28,665
    Thanks
    1,409
    Thanked
    2,830 times in 2,300 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X58A UD3R rev 2
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 950
      • Memory:
      • 12gb DDR3 2000
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD HD7870
      • PSU:
      • XFX Pro 650W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2311H
      • Internet:
      • O2 8mbps

    Re: Hexus HandBrake charts - who has the greatest multi-threaded POWER!!??

    My BBB results: 40.254021 fps 5m 54s

    I also tested different hard drives (with tron). The difference between my fastest (SSD) and slowest (5400rpm storage) was 1 second. I/O is not an issue here (unsurprising at the encode speeds most of us are getting - cache buffers are enough as read/write speed is faster than content creation.)

    Quote Originally Posted by Repressor View Post
    Tron - 1:47 - 33.741077fps avg
    Splice - 2:21 - 23.274151fps avg
    BBB - 4:03 - 35.407272fps avg

    Hopefully this looks right..

    <system
    You either didn't finish the BBB encode or counted the time wrong If 1stRaven is taking over 4 mins on a faster fps I don't think you'll be beating it.
    Last edited by kalniel; 08-07-2011 at 11:43 AM.

  3. Received thanks from:

    CAT-THE-FIFTH (08-07-2011)

  4. #83
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    10,456
    Thanks
    1,465
    Thanked
    872 times in 756 posts

    Re: Hexus HandBrake charts - who has the greatest multi-threaded POWER!!??

    To work out the time precisely, take the number of frames in the video and divide by the fps to give the time in seconds.

    E.g. 200 frames @ 20fps = 10 seconds.

    It should be fairly simple to add a calculation for this to the spreadsheet used for results (since the number of frames is a constant), just type the fps and the time appears.

  5. Received thanks from:

    CAT-THE-FIFTH (08-07-2011)

  6. #84
    Kaplah! OilSheikh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Londinium
    Posts
    5,232
    Thanks
    1,479
    Thanked
    282 times in 228 posts
    • OilSheikh's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P8P67
      • CPU:
      • i7 2600 w Xigmatek Thor's Hammer+ Noctua 14cm silent fan
      • Memory:
      • 4GB Crucial Ballistix Elite Tracer+ 4GB HyperX DDR3
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 860 Evo 500GB SSD + 1TB SAMSUNG F3
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI Rx 580 8GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • ZALMAN Z9 PLUS
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • 22" LG IPS LED
      • Internet:
      • 80Mbps Plusnet

    Re: Hexus HandBrake charts - who has the greatest multi-threaded POWER!!??

    People with i3 i5 i7 motherboards with onboard gfx, I think FPS will be higher if used with the onboard gfx rather thna a separate gfx card as some of the processors have gfx built-in.

  7. #85
    Senior Member kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    28,665
    Thanks
    1,409
    Thanked
    2,830 times in 2,300 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X58A UD3R rev 2
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 950
      • Memory:
      • 12gb DDR3 2000
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD HD7870
      • PSU:
      • XFX Pro 650W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2311H
      • Internet:
      • O2 8mbps

    Re: Hexus HandBrake charts - who has the greatest multi-threaded POWER!!??

    Quote Originally Posted by OilSheikh View Post
    People with i3 i5 i7 motherboards with onboard gfx, I think FPS will be higher if used with the onboard gfx rather thna a separate gfx card as some of the processors have gfx built-in.
    Why do you think that would make any difference? No graphics processors are used for handbrake, it's purely CPU/x86 (+SSE extensions).

    More commercial encoders can use GPU/compute/quicksync, but not handbrake.

  8. Received thanks from:

    OilSheikh (08-07-2011)

  9. #86
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    10,456
    Thanks
    1,465
    Thanked
    872 times in 756 posts

    Re: Hexus HandBrake charts - who has the greatest multi-threaded POWER!!??

    I would think the opposite actually - if the IGP is disabled, the CPU might be able to use more power rather than sharing the TDP with the graphics core.

  10. #87
    Guy
    Guy is offline
    HEXUS.social member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Hampshire, UK
    Posts
    5,134
    Thanks
    360
    Thanked
    387 times in 278 posts

    Re: Hexus HandBrake charts - who has the greatest multi-threaded POWER!!??

    Run the other tests on my work desktop, post 31 updated.

  11. Received thanks from:

    CAT-THE-FIFTH (08-07-2011)

  12. #88
    Comrade Moose CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Moosetopia
    Posts
    27,814
    Thanks
    3,050
    Thanked
    4,292 times in 3,328 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Hexus HandBrake charts - who has the greatest multi-threaded POWER!!??

    I have Quick Sync on my Core i3 2100 too but I want to look at CPU only encodes. Quick Sync still produces slightly lower quality encodes than CPU only. HandBrake is also free and can run under multiple operating systems too. AFAIK,the encoding software which can use Quick Sync is not free.


    Those despicable Elk,stealing the pond weed!

  13. #89
    Comrade Moose CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Moosetopia
    Posts
    27,814
    Thanks
    3,050
    Thanked
    4,292 times in 3,328 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Hexus HandBrake charts - who has the greatest multi-threaded POWER!!??

    If enough forum members want it I can set up another thread to compared "assisted" encoding using Quick Sync,CUDA and APP.


    Those despicable Elk,stealing the pond weed!

  14. #90
    Comrade Moose CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Moosetopia
    Posts
    27,814
    Thanks
    3,050
    Thanked
    4,292 times in 3,328 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Hexus HandBrake charts - who has the greatest multi-threaded POWER!!??

    Second post now updated.


    Those despicable Elk,stealing the pond weed!

  15. #91
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    10,456
    Thanks
    1,465
    Thanked
    872 times in 756 posts

    Re: Hexus HandBrake charts - who has the greatest multi-threaded POWER!!??

    GPU encoding isn't as easily compared, Anandtech recently mentioned it in the SNB review. Nvidia, for example, seems to produce bad quality output so it doesn't really matter if it's faster than CPU. Comparing between Quick Sync chips (HD 2000 vs HD3000 for example), or between GPUs within a brand would be the only meaningfull way of testing IMO.

  16. #92
    Senior Member Blackmage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,934
    Thanks
    202
    Thanked
    65 times in 45 posts
    • Blackmage's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI P67-GD65
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core I7 2600k
      • Memory:
      • 8 Gb Hynix DDR3 1333
      • Storage:
      • Crucial m4 120Gb, 2TB Samsung F4
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATI HD5830
      • PSU:
      • 700w Coolermaster Gold Plus
      • Case:
      • Xclio/Aplus Windtunnel
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic VX2239WM 22" LCD Monitor
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Broadband 10mbit

    Re: Hexus HandBrake charts - who has the greatest multi-threaded POWER!!??

    I'll have a go, and the rest a bit later.

    CPU Intel 2600K @4.48Ghz Win7 64bit 8Gb Ram

    Splice

    Avg fps 34.447369 fps Time 1 min 36secs

  17. Received thanks from:

    CAT-THE-FIFTH (08-07-2011)

  18. #93
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Chichester, West Sussex
    Posts
    288
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked
    43 times in 39 posts
    • Skulltrail's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Sabertooth X58
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7 920 @ 4.2GHz
      • Memory:
      • 12GB (3x4GB) Mushkin Blackline DDR3-1603 CAS8
      • Storage:
      • 120GB OCZ Agility 3 (Windows & Apps), 60GB OCZ Vertex 2E (VMs), 2x 3TB Seagate Barracuda 7200.14
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2GB Gigabyte GeForce GTX 670 (3x Windforce fans)
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX750 (modular)
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design R3
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Ultimate (64-bit) and Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" Dell Ultrasharp U2412M 1920x1200
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 76Mbps @ 64Mbps / 17Mbps

    Re: Hexus HandBrake charts - who has the greatest multi-threaded POWER!!??

    Bunny: 41.920227 fps - 5 mins 41 secs
    Splice: 29.001245 fps - 1 min 48 secs
    Tron: 42.087044 fps - 1 min 24 secs

    As left - 3.99GHz i7 920 @ 1.2V / 1524MHz DDR3 8-8-8-24. Both origional and encoded files were on the Vertex 2E.

  19. Received thanks from:

    CAT-THE-FIFTH (08-07-2011)

  20. #94
    Comrade Moose CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Moosetopia
    Posts
    27,814
    Thanks
    3,050
    Thanked
    4,292 times in 3,328 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Hexus HandBrake charts - who has the greatest multi-threaded POWER!!??

    Quote Originally Posted by shakerist View Post
    Bored. Couldn't sleep, so I got up overclocked my 1055t to 3.6ghz downloaded all trailers ran prime for 15 mins.
    Result:
    Very tired
    Big Buck Bunny avg FPS= 37.892361 fps
    Time taken 379 seconds
    Will carry on in the morning before i return to stock speeds

    Evidence :
    [03:07:26] hb_init: checking cpu count
    [03:07:26] hb_init: starting libhb thread
    HandBrake 0.9.5 (2011010300) - MinGW i386 - http://handbrake.fr
    6 CPUs detected
    Opening C:\Users\Mehmet\Desktop\cat bench...
    [03:07:26] hb_scan: path=C:\Users\Mehmet\Desktop\cat bench, title_index=1
    libbluray/bdnav/index_parse.c:157: indx_parse(): error opening C:\Users\Mehmet\Desktop\cat bench/BDMV/index.bdmv
    libbluray/bluray.c:960: nav_get_title_list(C:\Users\Mehmet\Desktop\cat bench) failed (0x183ce80)
    [03:07:26] bd: not a bd - trying as a stream/file instead
    libdvdnav: Using dvdnav version 4.1.3
    libdvdread: Encrypted DVD support unavailable.
    libdvdread: Device (null) inaccessible, CSS authentication not available.
    libdvdnavVDOpenFilePath:findDVDFile /VIDEO_TS/VIDEO_TS.IFO failed
    libdvdnavVDOpenFilePath:findDVDFile /VIDEO_TS/VIDEO_TS.BUP failed
    libdvdread: Can't open file VIDEO_TS.IFO.
    libdvdnav: vm: failed to read VIDEO_TS.IFO
    [03:07:26] dvd: not a dvd - trying as a stream/file instead
    Input #0, avi, from 'C:\Users\Mehmet\Desktop\cat bench\Big_Buck_Bunny_1080p_surround_FrostWire.com.avi':
    Metadata:
    encoder : AVI-Mux GUI 1.17.7, Aug 8 2006 20:59:17
    JUNK :
    Duration: 00:09:56.45, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 12455 kb/s
    Stream #0.0: Video: mpeg4, yuv420p, 1920x1080 [PAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], 24 tbr, 24 tbn, 24 tbc
    Stream #0.1: Audio: ac3, 48000 Hz, 5.1, s16, 448 kb/s
    [03:07:26] scan: decoding previews for title 1
    [03:07:26] scan: audio 0x1: AC-3, rate=48000Hz, bitrate=448000 Unknown (AC3) (5.1 ch)
    Scanning title 1...
    [03:07:26] scan: 10 previews, 1920x1080, 24.000 fps, autocrop = 0/0/0/0, aspect 16:9, PAR 1:1
    [03:07:26] scan: title (0) job->width:1920, job->height:1072
    [03:07:26] libhb: scan thread found 1 valid title(s)
    + title 1:
    + stream: C:\Users\Mehmet\Desktop\cat bench\Big_Buck_Bunny_1080p_surround_FrostWire.com.avi
    + duration: 00:09:56
    + size: 1920x1080, pixel aspect: 1/1, display aspect: 1.78, 24.000 fps
    + autocrop: 0/0/0/0
    + chapters:
    + 1: cells 0->0, 0 blocks, duration 00:09:56
    + audio tracks:
    + 1, Unknown (AC3) (5.1 ch) (iso639-2: und), 48000Hz, 448000bps
    + subtitle tracks:
    [03:07:26] 1 job(s) to process
    [03:07:26] starting job
    [03:07:26] sync: expecting 14339 video frames
    [03:07:26] job configuration:
    [03:07:26] * source
    [03:07:26] + C:\Users\Mehmet\Desktop\cat bench\Big_Buck_Bunny_1080p_surround_FrostWire.com.avi
    [03:07:26] + title 1, chapter(s) 1 to 1
    [03:07:26] + container: avi
    [03:07:26] + data rate: 12455 kbps
    [03:07:26] * destination
    [03:07:26] + C:\Users\Mehmet\Desktop\cat bench\1.mkv
    [03:07:26] + container: Matroska (.mkv)
    [03:07:26] * video track
    [03:07:26] + decoder: mpeg4
    [03:07:26] + frame rate: same as source (around 24.000 fps)
    [03:07:26] + strict anamorphic
    [03:07:26] + storage dimensions: 1920 * 1080 -> 1920 * 1080, crop 0/0/0/0, mod 0
    [03:07:26] + pixel aspect ratio: 1 / 1
    [03:07:26] + display dimensions: 1920 * 1080
    [03:07:26] + encoder: x264
    [03:07:26] + options: ref=2:bframes=2:subq=6:mixed-refs=0:weightb=0:8x8dct=0:trellis=0
    [03:07:26] + quality: 20.00 (RF)
    [03:07:26] * audio track 0
    [03:07:26] + decoder: Unknown (AC3) (5.1 ch) (track 1, id 1)
    [03:07:26] + bitrate: 448 kbps, samplerate: 48000 Hz
    [03:07:26] + mixdown: Dolby Pro Logic II
    [03:07:26] + encoder: faac
    [03:07:26] + bitrate: 160 kbps, samplerate: 48000 Hz
    [03:07:26] encx264: min-keyint: auto (24), keyint: 240
    [03:07:26] encx264: encoding with stored aspect 1/1
    [03:07:26] encx264: Encoding at constant RF 20.000000
    x264 [info]: using SAR=1/1
    x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: MMX2 SSE2Fast FastShuffle SSEMisalign LZCNT
    [03:07:26] reader: first SCR 11520 id 1 DTS 11520
    x264 [info]: profile Main, level 4.0
    No accelerated IMDCT transform found
    [03:13:43] reader: done. 1 scr changes
    [03:13:45] work: average encoding speed for job is 37.892361 fps
    [03:13:45] sync: got 14315 frames, 14339 expected
    [03:13:45] mpeg4-decoder done: 14315 frames, 0 decoder errors, 0 drops
    [03:13:45] render: lost time: 0 (0 frames)
    [03:13:45] render: gained time: 0 (0 frames) (0 not accounted for)
    x264 [info]: frame I:153 Avg QP:13.18 size:261440 PSNR Mean Y:50.60 U:54.54 V:55.36 Avg:51.54 Global:49.74
    x264 [info]: frame P:11384 Avg QP:17.57 size: 29295 PSNR Mean Y:46.71 U:50.31 V:51.06 Avg:47.59 Global:46.62
    x264 [info]: frame B:2778 Avg QP:23.33 size: 9086 PSNR Mean Y:45.38 U:51.52 V:52.33 Avg:46.36 Global:43.99
    x264 [info]: consecutive B-frames: 69.5% 4.3% 26.2%
    x264 [info]: mb I I16..4: 37.1% 0.0% 62.9%
    x264 [info]: mb P I16..4: 3.1% 0.0% 2.1% P16..4: 34.4% 7.4% 4.7% 0.0% 0.0% skip:48.2%
    x264 [info]: mb B I16..4: 1.7% 0.0% 1.0% B16..8: 19.6% 3.9% 0.3% direct: 5.9% skip:67.5% L0:40.4% L1:47.9% BI:11.8%
    x264 [info]: coded y,uvDC,uvAC intra: 45.5% 57.5% 29.1% inter: 12.5% 15.3% 2.8%
    x264 [info]: i16 v,h,dc,p: 44% 23% 15% 18%
    x264 [info]: i4 v,h,dc,ddl,ddr,vr,hd,vl,hu: 28% 17% 19% 5% 7% 8% 6% 6% 5%
    x264 [info]: i8c dc,h,v,p: 50% 22% 20% 8%
    x264 [info]: Weighted P-Frames: Y:1.3% UV:0.6%
    x264 [info]: ref P L0: 76.4% 11.5% 12.0% 0.1%
    x264 [info]: ref B L0: 69.8% 30.2%
    x264 [info]: ref B L1: 90.2% 9.8%
    x264 [info]: SSIM Mean Y:0.9904879 (20.217db)
    x264 [info]: PSNR Mean Y:46.491 U:50.589 V:51.349 Avg:47.389 Global:45.993 kb/s:5349.17
    [03:13:45] mux: track 0, 14315 frames, 398727820 bytes, 5348.70 kbps, fifo 8
    [03:13:45] mux: track 1, 27955 frames, 11926667 bytes, 159.99 kbps, fifo 512
    [03:13:45] libhb: work result = 0
    Rip done!
    HandBrake has exited.

    GOOD NIGHT


    EDIT: Did i do something wrong Repressor did in 243 seconds at a slower speed ?
    Is it possible you can run all three encodes??

    The top of the table is looking lonely with respect to AMD!!


    Those despicable Elk,stealing the pond weed!

  21. #95
    Comrade Moose CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Moosetopia
    Posts
    27,814
    Thanks
    3,050
    Thanked
    4,292 times in 3,328 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Hexus HandBrake charts - who has the greatest multi-threaded POWER!!??

    There seems to be no socket 1156 Core i3 or any Core i5 in the charts?? We need a few results from them too!!

    A few more Phenom II X4 or Phenom II X3 processors wouldn't go a miss too.

    In fact any more CPUs are welcome. More the merrier!!

    Anyone want to bench an Atom??


    Those despicable Elk,stealing the pond weed!

  22. #96
    Gentoo Ricer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Galway
    Posts
    10,764
    Thanks
    935
    Thanked
    910 times in 676 posts
    • aidanjt's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus VII Gene
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7-4771
      • Memory:
      • 2x8GB Corsiar LP 1866MHz C10
      • Storage:
      • 250GB Samsung 850 EVO
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0
      • PSU:
      • Corsair RM550
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define Mini
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus MK241
      • Internet:
      • 240mbps UPC Cable

    Re: Hexus HandBrake charts - who has the greatest multi-threaded POWER!!??

    On my desktop, specs on the left there, all runs used HandbrakeCLI with -Z Normal -v0 -i source.file -o outfile.mkv as arguments, and timed with time(1):

    1) Tron | avg 31.27fps | time 1m56.120s | size 87M
    2) Splice | avg 21.41fps | time 2m34.897s | size 158M
    3) Big Buck Bunny | avg 32.26fps | time 7m26.246s | size 393M
    Quote Originally Posted by Agent View Post
    ...every time Creative bring out a new card range their advertising makes it sound like they have discovered a way to insert a thousand Chuck Norris super dwarfs in your ears...

  23. Received thanks from:

    CAT-THE-FIFTH (08-07-2011)

Page 6 of 23 FirstFirst ... 345678916 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •