LinkBack URL
About LinkBackshttp://www.3dmark.com/fs/207511
Before this, my i5 was clocked @ 4.2 using MSI OC Genie. I ended up manually adding 0.1 to it to push the physics score over 8000.
That was a fun day!
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/207511
Before this, my i5 was clocked @ 4.2 using MSI OC Genie. I ended up manually adding 0.1 to it to push the physics score over 8000.
That was a fun day!
Wonder why your combined score is so low? you comfortably beat both my 7750 on graphics and 905e on physics, but your combined score is lower? Something throttling, perhaps?Originally Posted by HalloweenJack
That said, can't believe a 470 is only 626 points ahead of a low-profile bus-powered card on graphics
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/403504 (not reached enough posts for the full link)
it's the taking part that counts. although it is the top-spot for a 5670!
Last edited by scaryjim; 18-03-2013 at 04:55 PM. Reason: added link
Fixed the link for you - thanks for joining and contributing
That's pretty impresive tbh - I take it that's a GDDR5 5670? Puts my A6 in its place really - you don't realise how much a small snip in all areas will bring a GPU down.
Now what we need is an A10-5800k to see how it compares to the latest and greatest APU
thanks.Fixed the link for you - thanks for joining and contributing
That's pretty impresive tbh - I take it that's a GDDR5 5670? Puts my A6 in its place really - you don't realise how much a small snip in all areas will bring a GPU down.
Now what we need is an A10-5800k to see how it compares to the latest and greatest APU
yeah, it's a GDDR5 5670. picked him up a couple of years back for circa £50. tough little bugger, likes to be heard too. might let him off his leash before i replace him later this year. could be interesting!
heres my kids new pc
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/240666
an X6 1055T with the 6670 (DDR5) they have
Wonder why your combined score is so low? you comfortably beat both my 7750 on graphics and 905e on physics, but your combined score is lower? Something throttling, perhaps?
That said, can't believe a 470 is only 626 points ahead of a low-profile bus-powered card on graphics
sme cpu that does 2384 with a 7870 on combined so not the cpu ; will try another stock run with fan @ 100%
I've just ordered bits for an A10-5800k system (OCUK had a couple of A10-5800ks in their clearance section for the silly price of £49.99!). Once everything's arrived and built I'll run some benches and update the table.
Nice find! Im quite jealous actually
they`ve got A8-3800k for £40 - gutted its mid month so no cpu`s buying
They had some silly prices on graphics cards yesterday, but they mentioned them in their forums and they soon vanished! 7870 for £120, 7950 for £180. Still a 7870 XT for £150 and 7770 GHz for £65 available.
Also an Alpenfohn Matterhorn heatsink for £20 and an H60 for £25. I snagged a Xigmatek Loki for £8 for the A10 build. Probably other things too that I missed!
Last edited by Bagnaj97; 20-03-2013 at 01:56 PM.
Here is my scores for my 660ti
Score 5935 with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti(1x) and Intel Core i5-3570K Processor
Graphics Score
6599
Physics Score
9612
Combined Score
2550
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/52478
/fs/52478
Last edited by imginy; 20-03-2013 at 02:01 PM.
PROUDLY
taking the LOWEST firestrike score!
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/298645
on my own rig as well lol
kalniel (22-03-2013)
good effort sir!
although i must warn you, i have a 5450 lying around, and i can smell a shoot-out brewing...
You got you're 3570 stable @ 5Ghz? :O what vcore are you using and what temps are you at load?
Can I assume you didn't use IBT to stress it?
A10-5800k at stock, 2133 10-11-11-30 ram
1054 in Fire Strike (1159/4405 gfx/phys)
5655 Cloud Gate (8240/2696 gfx/phys) - 9800gt (lower clocked ECO version)/E6300@2.8 scored 6990/1499 for a total of 3853
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/423160
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
