Blimey! Do you three kids go to the same school?
J. Preston:
I said, " Immigration policy allows greater opportunity for crime."
Your reply; " So don't let them in....hense no crime?"
No. I would stop immigration until we are in better control of assessing who arrives. Immigration POLICY aids crime because it currently opens our borders without having an effective system in place to intercept criminals.
Employers don't ignore minimum wage? Erm...they can and do. As with immigration itself Labour has no decent system to monitor it. ( Apart from poverty stricken, scared legal and illegal immigrant informers. )
Mass immigration helped Americans and Australians? Which Americans and Australians? (Do I have to point out the irony in that statement?) And "technically" immigrant means "one who settles in another country." Implying to a settled area. When we left Ethiopia we weren't going back-packing around Europe.
Direthex:
Celebrate all faiths. They are the only remotely decent things around. But if your religion and/or laws conflict with that of another countrys, then respect them and don't go there. If they are free to print cartoons you may feel duty bound to react violently against ( or anything, inocuous or not ) then stay away. Your less likely to put yourself or them in danger and upset if you choose a more suitable country.
So you would tell that Polish mother who is unable to find a plumber, " These things happen?" "I've suffered to!"
Will you also say that when she can't find an electrician, nurse, doctor, dentist...
You say, if a gap appears in their market because a "few" plumbers go elsewhere then someone else just steps in to fill it? Then why can't we? Something to do with money perhaps..? You would rather play with their lives than address our own problems.
I like the percentage breakdown. Keep going though. Three countries make up the subcontinent. And the Jamaicans and Africans are different. So unless your saying they're all the same....Not so practical now, is it?
Ha! A twenty-two year old calls me "boy!" Thanks!
Though suffice to say I was reading, writing and understanding my country when you were merely full of ****. ( By that I mean you were still in nappies.)
Tony McNulty; " These are economically productive individuals....significant contributions.."
Yes. I've seen them massed together on the streets making their "significant contributions."
They are hoping a truck will pick them up and pay them a few quid for a seventeen hour day, ( 75% of all Eastern Europeans do menial work. )
Still a skills shortage? Let's ask the Poles how they fill their electrician, plumber, nurse, doctor, dentist....Now we have so many.
You seem to be saying allow anybody in irrespective of how they will be used. I told you, everyone must be assessed before entering Britian. And more to confirm they have not been threatened or tricked into being abused by " Anglo-Saxon " bastards. Immigration policy fails to do that. The system is currently overwhelmed.
Out of 25,700 asylum seekers last year 24,000 were told to " bog off ?" ( No bias there. )
Did they leave? And why were they told to? Oh yes, of course. Because we are racist.
The correct solution to war zones and environmental/economic hardships in other countries is not to take their best people and a few workers (in terms of their populations) and screw the rest as you seem to think. It is as much a focus on our economic sacrifice as anything. And sacrifice I would. For both my country and theirs.
Racist to you I suppose?
Nichomach:
Multiculture strengthens a country's economy and usually helps international relations up to a point. It doesn't aid domestic harmony, unity, or peace. Both we and America are powerful economically. Our and their social climates are harsh if you have no money. It now defines your worth both here and there. Kindness is still in people hearts. Just no longer in their consciousness.
That only comes with affinity and unity. Ones neighbours are strangers. And it is often merely wished so, not imposed.
What's this? Directhex implies that Yorkshiremen are lazy thieves. I say that i'd rather not have my country responsible for any possible hardships to Polish women, and I STILL get the blame?!
Re: Positive Discrimination. You say Cameron asked! You still think political leaders ask!
I didn't raise the subject of Empire sweetheart, you did. I just pointed out the difference between a "gift" and a commodity. And the argument was basically over the definition of the word " knowing " in the context of the past. No one has been "called on" in any specifics.
P.S. God forbid you should be redundant on anything!
P.P.S. Your first correspondence mentioned something about my going to a "meaningless little rock" so you could "happily ignore" me. Well, we are all on a meaningless little rock, and this is the third time you've ignored me.
( I expect your customary witty and insulting response please )