Just saw these..
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
360bhp (26-08-2011),Biscuit (19-08-2011),dfour (19-08-2011),EvanJackPenn (24-08-2011),watercooled (19-08-2011)
They're making use of all the numbers, I wonder how they'll name Trinity?
The design makes me think it should ramp higher, just because they have slimmed the cores down by moving the FPU out in a modular design, thus making each part of the silicon more efficient, allowing higher clockspeeds/cores, a bit like the principles cell/risc CPUs are built on.
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
Clock speed is a completely useless comparison between CPUs, even within an architecture it doesn't mean much - it's only useful for comparing EXACTLY the same die, with the same cache and same features enabled. Very few real-world applications scale between chips based on clockspeed, only very repetitive tasks with short, predictable instructions - MD5 hash brute-forcing for example, but this is also the type of application that run orders of magnitude better on GPUs or better still FPGAs/ASICs. It's interesting to see clockspeed of new chips, but it doesn't mean much beyond that.
When are these chips coming out and will they be the fastest cpu?
nibbler (22-08-2011)
I like how, from the look of things, all the processors are the same throughout (apart from cores and clock speeds, obviously). Although, what are the *s for on the frequencies of the 4120, 6120, 8120, 8170?
I'm curious if the first gen of these chips will be unlockable, the 4120 looks like a binned 8170 from the core speeds.
Mid September hopefully, AMD is due to showcase one under LN2 in a couple of weeks from memory.
Digerati (24-08-2011),j.o.s.h.1408 (22-08-2011)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)