Let's use an example: A guy went out drinking with a group of his buddies and in their drunken states the guys thought 'it would be a laugh' to beat up someone who just bumped into one in the group... The guys, without being under the influence of alcohol, would not do that, normally. But since they were, they went ahead.Originally posted by not_your_punk
we live in a nanny state. i should be able to stick what the hell i want into my body, as long as no-one else is harmed. the government enjoys its control over us as it gets cash from our legal drugs of tobacco and alcohol. they only allow these to be used by people beacuse of the ease of control they can have over them. they are power freaks and capitalist ba*tards who only care of cash and power rather than human rights and people's feelings. it needs to stop.
Who's fault is that? The alcohol? Or is it the guys who drank too much?
This is a very realistic example as this happens up and down the country on every Friday and Saturday nights. The ability to go and enjoy yourself is your human right. However, the ensuing trouble the drunks cause is a crime. Simple