Seeing DaBeeeenster's post in the Clare Short thread that he's had some nice letters from his MP reminded me of the time I wrote to my MP, Jim Dowd. After the commons vote on the bill to ban fox hunting, the BBC published a list of those MPs who had voted in favour of a ban, and sure enough he was one of them. Hunting with hounds is responsible for the deaths of something like 50,000-100,000 foxes a year (I forget the exact figure). Now that's all very sad and cruel (or not, depending on your viewpoint), but much greater carnage is caused by domesticated cats who are responsible for the deaths of literally millions of rodents and small birds every year. If anything the cruelty is worse because cats like to toy with their victims for a while before killing them; sometimes they wander off leaving them severely injured but alive. So, I wrote Mr Dowd the following letter:
Yes, I realised afterwards that I'd misspelt 'wander'.Dear Mr Dowd,
I discovered from an article on the BBC website that you were one of the MPs who recently voted in favour of a total ban on hunting with dogs. While this effort to protect the welfare of animals is laudable, I do feel that far more cruelty to animals could be prevented if the government were to ban the keeping of domestic cats as well. The numbers of rodents and small birds killed every year by cats must be several orders of magnitude greater than the number of foxes killed by hunting dogs. In addition, their suffering must in general be far worse because of the propensity of cats to play with and torture their victims before killing them, or indeed to wonder away leaving an injured animal to die slowly and in horrendous pain. As someone who is clearly concerned with animal welfare, I am sure that you will be keen to support a campaign to ban the keeping of cats. I look forward to hearing from you.
Yours etc.
His reply (which I don't have to hand, but I can remember it pretty well) said:
So, to paraphrase: "you make some good points, but it is beneath me to explain the flaws in your argument. I will also not be explaining why supporting a ban on hunting, but not on a practice which causes a great deal more suffering, is morally consistent."Dear Mr Galloway,
Thank you for your letter of <date>. While you make some good points, it is not my intention to support a ban on the keeping of domestic cats.
Yours etc.
I think that makes him an arrogant, hypocritical tosspot. What do you think?
Rich :¬)