LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksFRAPS mate.Originally Posted by Grey M@a
FRAPS mate.
Ah ok, will try it next time
Think I have an old fraps licence somewhere, not sure if the old version will work on win 7. Will have to check it out.
The free version is good enough for screen-shotting anyway!Ah ok, will try it next time
Think I have an old fraps licence somewhere, not sure if the old version will work on win 7. Will have to check it out.
Kalniel: "Nice review Tarinder - would it be possible to get a picture of the case when the components are installed (with the side off obviously)?"
CAT-THE-FIFTH: "The Antec 300 is a case which has an understated and clean appearance which many people like. Not everyone is into e-peen looking computers which look like a cross between the imagination of a hyperactive 10 year old and a Frog."
TKPeters: "Off to AVForum better Deal - £20+Vat for Free Shipping @ Scan"
for all intents it seems to be the same card minus some gays name on it and a shielded cover ? with OEM added to it - GoNz0.
I thought they did away with a free version and gave a 20 day trial at which point you needed to register it.
Either way it will be a while before screenshots as I have reverted back to my crappy points per round xD
Eurgh, just had a proper noob experience.
Some idiot player by the name of Implying was going round our M-COM stations and C4ing them until they were destroyed.
So many flaws in this ****ing game.
I don't see the problem ?
Kalniel: "Nice review Tarinder - would it be possible to get a picture of the case when the components are installed (with the side off obviously)?"
CAT-THE-FIFTH: "The Antec 300 is a case which has an understated and clean appearance which many people like. Not everyone is into e-peen looking computers which look like a cross between the imagination of a hyperactive 10 year old and a Frog."
TKPeters: "Off to AVForum better Deal - £20+Vat for Free Shipping @ Scan"
for all intents it seems to be the same card minus some gays name on it and a shielded cover ? with OEM added to it - GoNz0.
You don't see the problem? WE were defending the MCOM station, and a player from OUR TEAM (ie THE DEFENDERS) was taking out the MCOM stations we were meant to be DEFENDING.
must have been the enemy in disguise
I have seen recons C4 the objective for protection the detonate when an enemy goes near it but that just sounds very stupid.
You could of pointed out he was on yours rather than just eluding to him being a douchebag with some bombs.
Kalniel: "Nice review Tarinder - would it be possible to get a picture of the case when the components are installed (with the side off obviously)?"
CAT-THE-FIFTH: "The Antec 300 is a case which has an understated and clean appearance which many people like. Not everyone is into e-peen looking computers which look like a cross between the imagination of a hyperactive 10 year old and a Frog."
TKPeters: "Off to AVForum better Deal - £20+Vat for Free Shipping @ Scan"
for all intents it seems to be the same card minus some gays name on it and a shielded cover ? with OEM added to it - GoNz0.
team c4 really does very little to the MCOM anyway, i think its quite a viable tactic
*edit* in fact c4 itself does very little damage
Havent noticed this with the ps3 version... it takes 10 C4 to destroy your own mcom and you get -10 points for doing it.
They need to sort out some of the balance issues. It is obvious there are some big flaws when half the people are running around with M60 magnum ammo, Carl Gustav setups and the infamous 40mm with explosive mark 2.
At the minute these 3 setups are ruining the game because they steam roll over most other setups. The medic class in particular is too powerful. They out range and out gun assault classes along with the huge advantage of reviving and giving health. The support weapons should not be affected by magnum ammo.
The anti tank weapons are too good against human targets. I know the game is not realistic, but explosions do not kill armour. They kill people, but these weapons are lethal against people and effective against armour. They should reduce the damage to human targets and blast radius of these weapons to stop hordes of morons from using them as aim anywhere shotguns inside buildings.
The 40mm grenade launcher should only be available on 1 or 2 of the less effective assault rifles to reduce the overall effectiveness. They should not be affected by explosive mark 2.
This rant was inspired by an hour beating by nothing but those 3 setups (with the snipers of course but they don't bother me that much) on different servers. Eventually I just quit because it was to infuriating to continue.
Er...eh? I thought that's what medics are for, no?
Oh, of course. So if you get an RPG in the face, that's gotta tickle, right?
Dale
This hot girl came over to myspace last night, she twittered my yahoo till I
googled all over her facebook. Ask Jeeves...
System 1: Intel i5-2500k OC STABLE @5.05ghz with a ThermaTake Frio (air power!), 8Gb 1600 (9-9-9-24) R3 Patriot G2 RAM, nVidia GTX980TI ;
System 2: HP N40L Microserver;
System 3: MSI 'Ghost Pro' laptop - 16Gb DDR4 RAM, nVidia 970M, i7-6700, 256GB PCIe SSD + 1TB HDD
System 4: Samsung TAB S 10.1
Did you read what I wrote? I was stating that their weapons are insanely powerful along with the added advantage of the defib/medi packs.
Of course it should kill you if it hits you. At the minute it is if it hits within 2m of you. What bothers me most is that the likes of the Carl Gustav are so effective against people, they are heavily used in maps without any vehicles.
In short, you didn't actually read my post.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0p4fkH9qC4M&playnext_from=TL&videos=MVWKyKLbJVA
Tips & Tricks: How Not to be a Noob at Battlefield Bad Company 2
A really good introduction video to the game.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Steam: (
