Page 6 of 11 FirstFirst ... 3456789 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 96 of 169

Thread: Muslim Ghettoisation

  1. #81
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    432
    Thanks
    15
    Thanked
    24 times in 17 posts

    Re: Muslim Ghettoisation

    Quote Originally Posted by j1979 View Post
    theres a guy who lives down my street who swears he is Elvis
    "But he's a liar and I'm not sure about you" (Kirsty Maccoll)

  2. #82
    Senior Member j1979's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    2,038
    Thanks
    339
    Thanked
    209 times in 143 posts

    Re: Muslim Ghettoisation

    Quote Originally Posted by father smurf View Post
    "But he's a liar and I'm not sure about you" (Kirsty Maccoll)
    this thread could go anywhere from here on in!

  3. #83
    unapologetic apologist
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,954
    Thanks
    363
    Thanked
    274 times in 145 posts

    Re: Muslim Ghettoisation

    Quote Originally Posted by 360bhp View Post
    This video helps to explain Islam.

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZHujiWd49l4&feature=related

    Despite what the media show, it is a very peaceful religion about having good hygiene, having a pure heart, caring for the poor/orphans etc
    nope, it isn't. Sorry. I can quote you sura after sura which shows quite the opposite. And if you look at the latter part of Mohammed's life, it was all about waging war, not peace.

    I would also argue that the majority of Muslims are peaceful, but that is not a justification for saying Islam is peaceful. They just don't know their Qu'ran very well. Unfortunately, I do.

    And furthermore, about 80% of Muslims don't speak arabic, but they can recite verse after verse of the Qu'ran in Arabic. A sad fact - they learn it in a language they don't speak, and rely on their Imams to translate it for them. NOT very helpful for constructive debate. After all, the very word 'islam' means to submit, not argue / debate / discuss.



    oh, and I like Muslims for the most part. Very hospitable. But they generally don't know their own scripture.

  4. #84
    unapologetic apologist
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,954
    Thanks
    363
    Thanked
    274 times in 145 posts

    Re: Muslim Ghettoisation

    Quote Originally Posted by j1979 View Post
    OPINION ....

    thats my point, the copy of the Quran that you own is undoubtly a book of opinions, as the original text can not be proven..or correctly translated or understood.

    and the same is true of the bible, new and old testaments.
    sorry, not true about the Bible. There is much that can be historically verified. MUCH. Which is why the British Museum now has direct scriptural references on some of its exhibits.

    also, the new testament can be proven to be correctly translated from the originals beyond any reasonable doubt, beyond any other historical document in history within 750 years of its writing (i.e. better than documents 750 years NEWER than the Bible)

    "...or understood": - that is a rash comment to make. In no way justified.

  5. #85
    unapologetic apologist
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,954
    Thanks
    363
    Thanked
    274 times in 145 posts

    Re: Muslim Ghettoisation

    Quote Originally Posted by shadowmaster View Post
    What 360bhp is trying to say is that there is only 1 arabic version of the Quran. A Quran in its original arabic form bought it England, is no different to one bought in India or Indonesia, nor is it different to 1000 year old scripts of the Quran.
    um, not true. the widely unknown fact is the Qu'ran was only canonised in the 1930's!!!!! Not a 1000 years ago etc.

    The earliest document we can study of the Qu'ran has *thousands* of annotations, i.e. revisions of the original text. It's late now, but I can provide exact numbers if you want.

    Further, I can provide MUCH material from *Muslim* scholars about all the contradictions and inconsistencies within the Qu'ran. Forget about scholars of other faiths / secular scholars.

    HTH

  6. #86
    Admin (Ret'd)
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    18,481
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    3,208 times in 2,281 posts

    Re: Muslim Ghettoisation

    Quote Originally Posted by fuddam View Post
    sorry, not true about the Bible. There is much that can be historically verified. MUCH. Which is why the British Museum now has direct scriptural references on some of its exhibits.

    also, the new testament can be proven to be correctly translated from the originals beyond any reasonable doubt, beyond any other historical document in history within 750 years of its writing (i.e. better than documents 750 years NEWER than the Bible)
    Then why is there so much argument over some critical parts, right down to words or phrases?

    For instance, and to use one of the more obvious examples, is it killing or murder that's prohibited? (That's rhetorical, by the way )

    It's not just about a literal translation from one language to another, though that alone is contentious enough. It's also about interpretation. For instance, murder is a legal definition, at least in today's society and in the UK. And as the legal system, in a different country and 2000 years ago was very different, interpreting a prohibition against "murder" requires a thorough understanding, not just of the original language, but the original cultural and legal contexts too, in order to not just translate words but cultural contexts. Did, for example, the "authors" of the Bible have a word, then, for what we call murder these days? We need to compare like with like to be sure that "killing" then isn't equivalent to "murder", in context, these days.

    Consider James Joyce's Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Unless you either have a thorough understanding of the cultural setting, or study that context quite carefully, reading the book would inevitably result in either a considerable degree of misunderstanding, or confusion, or completely missing a good percentage of the point, or all three. And that's in our own language (sort-of) and less than 100 years ago. Anyone that wants to know what I'm talking about ought to try reading it.

    The same point applies, for instance, to Dickens. Taken at a simplistic level, they're good (or depending on your point of view, bad) novels. Taken on another level, they're biting political satire. Taken on yet another level, they're a political reformation project.

    And to take yet another example, read Chaucer in the original. Again, our own language, but without a fair bit of training and interpretation, most people would see it as a foreign language, and that's just the language, let alone the cultural context.

    But even if it's 'kill', not "murder", kill what? An absolute prohibition against killing anything, or just humans? Does it mean you can't even kill in self-defence if it's the only way to protect yourself? Or is it a justification for vegetarianism, in that is you can't kill at all, then you can't kill animals to eat. But wait, plants are alive too, so does the prohibition preclude killing plants? Because if it does, we're all going to get a tad hungry if we obey it.

    The argument about the literal translation of that commandment bounces back and forth among academics, some arguing one way, others another way. Are all those arguments objective, or are some putting things in their own cultural or political context, and arguing for how they want it to be interpreted, regardless of whether that is how it was originally intended.

    And to complicate matters much further, if we accept for the sake of argument that the Bible is the Word of God, how much of it was actually written down from first hand witnessing of God's actual word, and how much was handed down for years, word of mouth, or even generations like that, before it finally got written down? How much of what we currently have is that original word of God, and how much has been through the "send three and fourpence, I'm going to a dance" process. I'll explain that remark if anyone doesn't know what I'm talking about.

    j1979 has a point - much of the Bible can't be proven. Even if you could prove that it was 100% correct translation, and that requires a correct transposition of cultural contexts to ensure correct meaning, as well as a literal translation, I'd love to see how you're going to prove that it actually is what it is claimed to be, i.e. the Word of God.

    It may be that much Biblical detail can be historically verified, but so it would be if someone contemporaneous to the relevant period made it up as a novel, or just ..... erm ..... embellished it a bit. But while some facts can be verified as accurate, or at least consistent, it's impossible to verify a lot. We can't even verify a lot of what happened at JFKs assassination, and I for one was alive at the time, it was caught on film, and it's been the subject of investigation after comprehensive investigation, numerous documentaries that examined living witnesses, and a vast amount of research and writing. And we STILL don't know quite what happened for sure. You have no chance at all of being 100% sure of events 2000 years ago that have passed mouth-to-mouth, let alone the meaning, or indeed whether it actually is the word of God, or just a paraphrasing of the collective words of an eloquent and charismatic political reformer.

  7. Received thanks from:

    RoBe (16-07-2008),Salazaar (16-07-2008),shadowmaster (16-07-2008),spazman (23-07-2008)

  8. #87
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    396
    Thanks
    70
    Thanked
    44 times in 30 posts
    • RoBe's system
      • Motherboard:
      • asus p5k premium
      • CPU:
      • q6600 g0 @ 3.4ghz 1.3v
      • Memory:
      • 4gb ocz reaper
      • Storage:
      • 1xmaxtor 250gb2xsamsung 500gb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • xfx gtx 260 (216 cores)
      • PSU:
      • corsair hx620
      • Case:
      • silverstone tj09 - silver
      • Operating System:
      • Vista Home Premium x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • samsung 226bw
      • Internet:
      • bt

    Re: Muslim Ghettoisation

    Quote Originally Posted by Saracen View Post
    "send three and fourpence, I'm going to a dance"
    send reinforcements, i'm going to advance!

  9. #88
    unapologetic apologist
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,954
    Thanks
    363
    Thanked
    274 times in 145 posts

    Re: Muslim Ghettoisation

    Saracen: good points all.

    Was simply stating that the assumption that the biblical text has been corrupted through translation is bogus, NOT that there is a single interpretation, or that it can all be proven 100%

    from a historian's POV, it is accurate to the original texts.


  10. #89
    Seething Cauldron of Hatred TheAnimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    17,168
    Thanks
    803
    Thanked
    2,152 times in 1,408 posts

    Re: Muslim Ghettoisation

    Quote Originally Posted by fuddam View Post
    sorry, not true about the Bible. There is much that can be historically verified. MUCH. Which is why the British Museum now has direct scriptural references on some of its exhibits.

    also, the new testament can be proven to be correctly translated from the originals beyond any reasonable doubt, beyond any other historical document in history within 750 years of its writing (i.e. better than documents 750 years NEWER than the Bible)

    "...or understood": - that is a rash comment to make. In no way justified.
    This isn't a competition of which religious text is somehow going to be more 'acurate', as thats like going to a miss america pagent and woundering which one can do quantum mechanics best.

    It is simply a case of interpretation, as always a reader will be able to find out whatever message they want from any text, because they go looking for that particular message and convientantly ignore everything else.

    As i write this is sudenly think this phenonominan is in no way restricted to religious texts. There was a program on a couple of weeks ago about 9/11 conspiracies, there the advocates blindly find little cracks in the offical explaniation and create something concrete out of them, completely ignoring rational thought about anything that contradicts their desired outcome.

    In short, they suffer from an appaling lack of logic and clarity of thought. Why would a religious zelot be any different? The book dosent have to be evil, they will make it evil themselfs.
    throw new ArgumentException (String, String, Exception)

  11. #90
    unapologetic apologist
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,954
    Thanks
    363
    Thanked
    274 times in 145 posts

    Re: Muslim Ghettoisation

    well, the thing is, if one IS going to dicuss any religion and its claims, one has to go back to the text. There is nothing else we can appeal to, for the very reasons of the differing interpretations you mention.

    After all, in this case, both texts claim to be divine.

    So, if either text illustrates historical inaccuracies, blatant contradictions, bad grammar, a lack of logic etc, mistranslation, a lack of continuity, one would naturally view it with some skepticism.

    So, was simply saying that the accusation of mistranslation over the centuries cannot be levelled at the Bible. Of the other text in discussion.........

  12. #91
    Seething Cauldron of Hatred TheAnimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    17,168
    Thanks
    803
    Thanked
    2,152 times in 1,408 posts

    Re: Muslim Ghettoisation

    Lets pretend it was this simple.

    We all knew the sacred text of scientology was correct, it was proved beyound all un-equivicable doubt. We also knew that the fible was wrong, flawed etc.

    It dosen't remotely matter which book the person leverages to fit their goals, because they will be able to spin it how they see fit. Carefully picking and chooseing the 'evidence' in the same way a consipiracy theorist does.

    This is why its important that people who are deaply beliving that their text is sacred... Have an understanding that their interpretation might be deaply flawed. In much the same way some people try to claim the earth is only 6k years old or some such easily dis-proveable tosh.
    throw new ArgumentException (String, String, Exception)

  13. #92
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    432
    Thanks
    15
    Thanked
    24 times in 17 posts

    Re: Muslim Ghettoisation

    An example how accurate the christian bible is:

    How come so many parts where stolen from the Sumerian legends - example:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilgamesh_flood_myth

  14. #93
    Admin (Ret'd)
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    18,481
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    3,208 times in 2,281 posts

    Re: Muslim Ghettoisation

    Quote Originally Posted by fuddam View Post
    ....

    So, was simply saying that the accusation of mistranslation over the centuries cannot be levelled at the Bible. Of the other text in discussion.........
    Of course the accusation can be levelled. That is a cold, hard and easily provable fact. For a start, I levelled that accusation, so you have proof positive right there. And I'm incredibly far from the first to do so, rather doubt I'll be the last, and am also very far from the best qualified.

    Whether those accusations are justified or not, or correct or not, is another matter.

  15. #94
    Welcome to stampytown! Salazaar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Oxford-ish
    Posts
    4,459
    Thanks
    505
    Thanked
    353 times in 254 posts
    • Salazaar's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asrock B450m Steel Legend
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 5 3600
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 5700 XT

    Re: Muslim Ghettoisation

    Lets see... It seems to me that all religions (and subsets/castes/splinter groups of said religions) tend to:
    a) disagree with each other wildly about the nature of god and the tenants of faith
    b) steal ideas wholeheartedly from each other and from earlier religions and
    c) claim that their truth is the only true truth despite all the other religions being united on the single issue that they are wrong.

    This leads me to deduce that:
    a) They must all be wrong (except the ones that are right).
    b) Believe whatever the hell you like (who knows, you might be the one who's right).
    c) Don't get pissy if everyone else who thinks you're wrong doesn't take well to being told to do things your way.
    ____
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

  16. #95
    Senior Member j1979's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    2,038
    Thanks
    339
    Thanked
    209 times in 143 posts

    Re: Muslim Ghettoisation

    Quote Originally Posted by Salazaar View Post
    a) disagree with each other wildly about the nature of god and the tenants of faith
    .
    well the three main monotheisic religions, Judaism, Christianity, Islam are all based on the same god and all could be called sects of the same religion. then there are sects within each,

    Judaism has Orthodox, reform ect.
    Christianity has catholic / Anglican
    Islam has Sunny, Shia

    and lots and lots of smaller sects ...

    the only thing that we can conclude is man loves fighting/disagring with his fellow man. no matter what the end goal is or how small the issue. we love it. so bring on WW3 , you know you wanna!!

  17. #96
    sneaks quietly away. schmunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Wiki Wiki Wild West side... of Sussex
    Posts
    4,424
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked
    163 times in 121 posts
    • schmunk's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Abit NF7-S v2.0
      • CPU:
      • AMD Athlon-M 2500+
      • Memory:
      • 1GB of Corsair BH-5 and 512MB of something else
      • Storage:
      • 160GB Seagate Barracuda
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATI Radeon X800Pro, flashed to XT
      • PSU:
      • Hiper Type-M ~400W
      • Case:
      • Antec cheapy
      • Monitor(s):
      • AG Neovo F19 LCD
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 4MB/s

    Re: Muslim Ghettoisation

    Quote Originally Posted by Saracen View Post
    Of course the accusation can be levelled. That is a cold, hard and easily provable fact. For a start, I levelled that accusation, so you have proof positive right there.
    Ooh, you wordsmith, you. Bravo!

Page 6 of 11 FirstFirst ... 3456789 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Malaysia firm's 'Muslim car' plan
    By 0iD in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 15-11-2007, 12:43 PM
  2. The Muslim veil issue
    By Taz in forum Question Time
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 25-11-2006, 12:01 AM
  3. Muslim Rave
    By Phuxd in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 14-05-2006, 05:58 PM
  4. Court of Appeal reverses ruling over Muslim dress
    By nichomach in forum Question Time
    Replies: 138
    Last Post: 08-03-2005, 10:58 PM
  5. Replies: 171
    Last Post: 25-06-2004, 09:08 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •