Thanks
I'd only got my TS-E primes with me on this walk, so I'd got a limited scope for framing. The house was an important compositional element, but I would have liked to keep more sky in the frame. I'd been in this area for most of the afternoon and I climbed higher and also descended lower with my compact to find a composition that I liked. I ended up going back to my original visualisation for a photo because I would need to get my composition fine-tuned before the light arrived.
My 24mm was too wide as the foreground wasn't all that interesting (and would have added unnecessary complication to the frame - the house would've been lost), so I my choice was either the 45mm or 90mm. It was quickly apparent that if I wanted to include the house, I'd need to use the 45mm lens.
I played around with the movements, but hadn't got the lens converted to offer both tilt/swing and shift on the same plane. I did move the focal plane around a bit and attempted to squash the perspective in the top half of the frame, but I ended up settling on this. I guess it was a compromise, but then all photographs are a compromise in one way or another.