I find the wide end of my 17-50mm wide enough tbh (17mm is equiv to 25mm on 35mm), I am thinking about getting a super wide angle (probably the 10-20mm) but then I think what exactly would I do with it?
I think the danger with a SWA lens is taking super wide landscapes and losing any point of focus to the picture
Well in the sunset pictures you took the silhouetted housing is a focal point, and the rest is just a glorious skyscape. You don't even need a focal point if the landscape is nice enough, but I think very wides actually make this easier by allowing you to include something very close in the foreground as well.
I really like mine for taking photos inside. Part of it may be that other than my fixed-50, it's the fastest lens i have, so it does low light well and you can actually take photos of the person sitting right next to you without getting an extreme close up
Need to get some more f2.8 glass, it's lovely stuff.
Agreed, love my sigma 10-20. In fact the extreme close ups I got at Autosport have made me consider a rectilinear fisheye . Anyway, here's an older one experimenting with a macro adapter on my 450D's kit lens, makes a nice wallpaper.
Couldn't resist adding this, from Draycote Water
Last edited by Ruggerbugger; 25-02-2009 at 11:46 PM.
Nice skyline, real nice colours...
apart from the border.. whats that green all about? cant say it compliments the photo (either of the above) in my opinion...
: RFNX Ste | : stegough | www.stegough.com
what camera do you have?
| Photographer |
my wife has this one: http://www.argos.co.uk/static/Produc...NON+CAMERA.htm
it has a full on manual control too
how much was your A720? if ist more then £300 you should of just got a DSLR
Ask your boss for a payrise and treat yourself!
There are currently 12 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 12 guests)